However, many chief procurement officers (CPOs) are still facing significant challenges when it comes to leading their functions through the necessary transformations required to thrive in today's environment. To help organizations empower their procurement functions and those who lead them, we sought to understand how the procurement landscape is evolving, the leadership characteristics of those at the helm, and the human capital-related actions organizations should prioritize to stay competitive, finding that:
Procurement priorities have clearly changed in recent years. In Deloitte's CPO survey in 2018, the top three priorities were reducing costs, new product/market development, and managing risks. By 2023, those top priorities had shifted to driving operational efficiency, enhancing ESG/CSR, and digital transformation. Interestingly, two significant transformations—ESG/CSR (ranked 6th in 2018) and digital (not listed as a priority in 2018)—have emerged as top priorities within the last five years.1 2
The role of procurement has definitely evolved in recent years. A few years ago, procurement was mainly about price and savings. Nowadays you are more strategically involved, more about agility and resilience… The question becomes how to bring innovation from your partners to Unilever and vice versa. It requires much closer collaboration with the partners, but also internally...”3Willen Uijen |
These shifting priorities are having varied impacts on CPOs, and this is dependent on their specific responsibilities. A CPO can manage indirect procurement, direct procurement, or both, and the scope and strategic nature of the role can vary notably across industries and firms. And these remits often define who the CPO reports to, as these real-life examples exemplify:
CPOs that manage a larger indirect spend for companies that don’t “make” something will typically report to the CFO. However, if the company makes products or components, and procurement supports a large network of facilities, the CPO typically reports to a COO or CEO. Furthermore, our search and assessment work shows that CPOs reporting to the COO or CEO tend to be more strategic and value-based.
Hence, it is essential to benchmark procurement functions against comparable organizations when assessing priorities and related strategies.
While best-in-class procurement functions appear well-positioned to weather the changing environment, the majority are early in their transformations – in the “basic order taking” or “functionally advanced” stages (Figure 1). In these stages, digital tools may automate certain basic reporting tasks, but most processes still rely on manual efforts. As a result, for the majority of procurement departments, priorities like digital and AI transformation represent substantial undertakings. Furthermore, the gap between leaders and laggards in this regard is widening rapidly.
Figure 1: The maturity of procurement organizations – five archetypes
Source: Delaney, Mary, et al. Using M&A to transform procurement. McKinsey. March 1, 2023.
Yet, for many of these early-stage organizations, transformation is a significant challenge, with persistence of barriers like scarcity of talent and skills across organizational levels. A survey conducted by BCG among C-suite and board-level executives found that 39% of respondents identified difficulties in attracting, developing, and retaining skills as one of the top five barriers to changing procurement.4 This survey was conducted before the AI revolution gained momentum, which has further exacerbated the knowledge and skills gaps.
The role of the CPO is vital for driving successful transformation within the procurement function. To gain a better understanding of these versatile leaders and their potential strengths and weaknesses in confronting the above challenges and opportunities, we analyzed the demographic data of 77 CPOs and examined personality traits and values through Hogan psychometric test scores of 122 procurement leaders.
Interestingly, around 60% of CPOs were in the role for the first time (Figure 2). Furthermore, around 58% of these first-time CPOs have been in the position for less than four years. Thus, a significant proportion of CPOs only held the role amidst significant disruptions and prolonged challenges. These are factors to consider when assessing coaching and development opportunities.
Figure 2: CPO demographics
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates proprietary analysis, N = 77 CPOs, May 2024
However, our research shows that most CPOs have personalities that are well-equipped to weather this continued uncertainty.
Through our analysis of Hogan data, we discovered five common characteristics among the CPO population, despite variations in the nature and complexity of their roles. These characteristics include high adaptability and optimism, a results-focused mindset, drive and determination, diplomatic and trust-building abilities, as well as a supportive and team-oriented approach (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Five common CPO characteristics
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates proprietary analysis of Hogan psychometric data, N = 122 CPOs
Considering the imperative for collaboration and adaptability in the current business environment, CPOs appear to possess many personality traits and values that can be seen as strengths. Additionally, CPO’s supportive and team oriented approach can be beneficial in retaining, attracting and further upskilling talent – all critical activities for procurement functions in their transformation journey.
Given the heightened strategic significance of the CPO role, we also wanted to understand how they compare to COOs, who often hold the highest-ranking position in operations and supply chain.
Interestingly, we found only a few notable differences between the two leader cohorts. In fact, on a global level, COOs and CPOs have more in common than COOs based in North America compared to those in Europe. We discovered that it tends to be more challenging for CPOs to trust others in pressure situations than for COOs. Additionally, COOs tend to prefer working environments that are productive and follow a no-nonsense mentality while CPOs tend to place a premium on a “work hard, play hard” mentality.
While skills and competencies may need to be developed and complemented through the right team, the findings suggest that CPOs possess personality traits and values that make transitioning to a COO role a viable career path. As organizations consider the future of their procurement teams and leaders, these learnings highlight both a potential career path and new development considerations, including cultivating the ability to trust others in pressure situations, harnessing the power of teams, and moderating the "play hard" mentality.
CPOs that effectively navigate the changing environment can play a critical role in differentiating their company against competition. These functions have a significant impact on top- and bottom-line growth, with procurement spend typically accounting for 30% of revenue for service firms and at least 50% of revenue for manufacturing companies.5 Furthermore, procurement plays a crucial role in establishing contracts and policies with numerous suppliers that form the supply chain, ultimately exerting a significant influence on sustainability impact.
To effectively navigate the evolving priorities and advance the maturity of procurement, hiring teams should prioritize their CPO’s personal development, as well as talent acquisition, retention, and upskilling across procurement teams. Furthermore, the current situation presents unique career advancement opportunities for CPOs to seize.
By prioritizing the above initiatives, organizations can position their procurement functions for success. This not only enhances the effectiveness of procurement but also contributes to the overall success of the organization. Advances in procurement can well be the company’s biggest opportunity to transform business performance.
Ben Shrewsbury leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Operations & Supply Chain Officers capability globally. He is based in Dallas.
Fawad Bajwa leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Operations & Supply Chain Officers capability in the Americas. He is based in Toronto.
Vijuraj Eranazhath leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Operations & Supply Chain Officers capability in Asia Pacific. He is based in Mumbai.
Gregory Gerin leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Operations & Supply Chain Officers capability in EMEA. He is based in Brussels.
Mika Nurminen leads Knowledge for Russell Reynolds Associates’ Operations & Supply Chain Officers capability. He is based in Toronto.
1 Younger, Lance, et al. Deloitte’s Chief Procurement Officer survey in 2018. Deloitte. 2018
2 Addicoat, Aaron, et al. 2023 Global Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) Survey. Deloitte. 2023
3 Van Leemput, Angelo. Willem Uijen (Unilever): we pursue procurement with purpose. Management Scope. August 29, 2023
4 Garg, Mudit et al. Seven Forces Reshaping Procurement. BCG. May 17, 2023
5 Hales, Mike et al. Realizing the power of procurement. Kearney. January 14, 2020
Link Classes Test
Test Global Link 2 (without link)
Test Hero Link Light |
Test Hero Link Dark |
Test Hero Link Blue |
Test Hero Link Purple |
Test Hero Link Green |
Test Hero Link Burgundy |
Test Play Button |