Republished by Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
Although efforts to improve diversity, inclusion, and equity (DE&I) of employees and leaders in organizations continue, the number of organizations tangibly tracking accountability for the outcome of those efforts is still relatively low.
Russell Reynolds Associates’ 2022 Global Leadership Monitor research identified that just 17% of global leaders we surveyed said executives at their organizations are compensated on DE&I outcomes. Even against a benchmark that low, there is no single industry or region leading the way on DE&I accountability. The Technology industry lags notably behind.
Without accountability metrics, it’s virtually impossible for organizations to measure their leaderships’ performance against DE&I objectives and to compensate them accordingly, as they would with other measures of business performance. As many research studies show the link between DE&I and organizational performance, DE&I metrics should be included more widely as a component of compensation-based accountability models.
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates’ 2022 Global Leadership Monitor Survey, n=984 global executives
Source: Russell Reynolds Associates’ 2022 Global Leadership Monitor Survey, n=984 global executives
RRA’s analysis of 984 global organizations across industries established a significant linear relationship between organizations that compensate leaders for DE&I outcomes and one essential practices that enables this type of accountability: having a strategic plan for increasing the diversity of the leadership succession candidate pool.
This practice informs just part of the foundational building blocks for a sustainable DE&I operation. It’s equally important that each organization understands which additional DE&I outcomes are important to their context, employees, and communities to ensure that their accountability efforts reinforce what success means for them.
In our research of DE&I operating models at 158 organizations, we established that organizations that hit the ground running on DE&I with impressive momentum had a defined focus for their DE&I strategy and set accountability for that strategy by linking it to business results. We defined these organizations as on the “fast-track” to DE&I success.
Why does accountability matter? Because in recent years, leaders have implemented DE&I initiatives with mixed results according to Culture Amp’s 2022 Workplace DEI Report,1 which details that many diverse groups remain pessimistic about their inclusion in the workplace. Along with internal scrutiny of diversity initiatives, external stakeholders such as federal and state legislators have become increasingly vocal in their support of requiring government mandates for DE&I.
Read more about what it means to fast track your DE&I efforts here:
Is There a Fast Track to DE&I Maturity? | Russell Reynolds
Nisa Qosja is a member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Diversity, Equity & Inclusion practice Knowledge team. She is based in London.
Jemi Crookes is a member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Center for Leadership Insight. She is based in Washington DC.
Genine Yarborough is a member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Corporate Center. She is based in New York City.